Theme
12:54pm August 22, 2014
waywardandwanderlust:

heartsandmagic:

Cat doesn’t know what to do with the butterfly that flew on its paw.

I can’t breathe I’m laughing too hard

waywardandwanderlust:

heartsandmagic:

Cat doesn’t know what to do with the butterfly that flew on its paw.

I can’t breathe I’m laughing too hard

12:51pm August 22, 2014
falcaomagistral:

skittles-and-cyanide:

lokistimetravelingsassbutt:

also, wednesday has been canceled due to scheduling errors.

And now, the weather.

[waitin for the bus in the rain in the rain wait waitin for the bus in the rain]

falcaomagistral:

skittles-and-cyanide:

lokistimetravelingsassbutt:

also, wednesday has been canceled due to scheduling errors.

And now, the weather.

[waitin for the bus in the rain in the rain wait waitin for the bus in the rain]

12:40pm August 22, 2014

huffingtonpost:

THIS MAN HAS ALS, AND HIS ICE BUCKET CHALLENGE WILL MAKE YOU LAUGH. THEN IT’LL MAKE YOU CRY

The video begins humorously as Anthony Carbajal, a photographer, dresses up in a neon bikini top and soaps up a car before being doused with ice water. 

So watch the full video here and laugh out loud at the first half and then get ready to tear up in the second half. 

12:22pm August 22, 2014

 Reactions to Marve's New Spiderwoman Cover & Marvel's Response In Turn

Can’t say I’m surprised this was Marvel’s reply. :|

Yes, Marve, this -is- exploitative.  When all that I see when I first look at the cover is Spiderwoman’s backside and how it looks like she’s in a sex position more than crouching on a building (seriously, wtf is that supposed to even be), that’s a problem.  I didn’t even realize her face was on it until I got over that first brow-raising moment - which was much later.

11:44pm August 21, 2014

jaclcfrost:

geekyartchick:

jaclcfrost:

imagine ur otp

doing

the forehead touch

now imagine ur otp doing the forehead touch

as one of them dies in the other’s arms

take that somewhere else

9:55pm August 21, 2014
peashooter85:

A pair of silver inlaid flintlock pistols by John George Lacy of London, circa 1804 - 1814.
For Sale: $19,995

peashooter85:

A pair of silver inlaid flintlock pistols by John George Lacy of London, circa 1804 - 1814.

For Sale: $19,995

9:54pm August 21, 2014
crowstone7350 asked: heya on the post with the quote about radical/extreme feminism, i'm not quite sure I get it- Is it just saying to use a different word for radical feminists?

meloromantics:

crowstone7350:

atasteofcandor:

Thanks for asking for clarification!

Ok here’s the quote:"Radical" means root, not extremism. Radical feminism means getting to the root of female oppression. And if freeing women from thousands of years of oppression is extreme to you, you are either an oppressor or have Stockholm Syndrome.

So, to answer your question: no, this is not calling for a new term to be used for radical feminists, it is saying that in the term “radical feminism,” radical is not meant to mean extreme. It is meant to mean “root” as in square root, another term for radical in math. 

There are a lot of misconceptions about radical feminism, so Jitana Sunflower-Rose is saying “look, radical feminism isn’t about extremism. it’s about getting to the root of women’s oppression, aka the gender hierarchy,” which explains the next line of the quote:

"And if freeing women from thousands of years of oppression is extreme to you, you are either an oppressor or have Stockholm Syndrome."

I hope that clears it up for you!

Oh!  I thought “Radical Feminist” was something a feminist calls other feminists who they disagree with, for example I would call a trans-exclusionary feminist a TERF.   So I didn’t know that “Radical Feminist” was an actual thing that one would call oneself!  I’ll go look more into it…

and here we see the difference between what a word means and what a word is used for when women say something you don’t like!

5:01pm August 21, 2014
5:03am August 21, 2014
11:08pm August 20, 2014

outofcontextdnd:

GM: “You can’t interrogate someone you don’t share a language with.”

Enforcer: “Everyone speaks ‘I-want-to-keep-my-toes.’”

10:27pm August 20, 2014

breelandwalker:

NORWEGIAN

FOREST

CATS

VIKING

KITTAHS

8:56pm August 20, 2014
cosmictuesdays:

nadiacreek:

coelasquid:

deformutilated:

Fudge recipe on a headstone

I feel like I should make this just to be able to say a dead person taught me how to make it. Maybe I’ll do it for Halloween.

I desperately hope that she spent her entire life telling people that they could have her fudge recipe “over my dead body.”

That last comment is absolutely worth reblogging.

cosmictuesdays:

nadiacreek:

coelasquid:

deformutilated:

Fudge recipe on a headstone

I feel like I should make this just to be able to say a dead person taught me how to make it. Maybe I’ll do it for Halloween.

I desperately hope that she spent her entire life telling people that they could have her fudge recipe “over my dead body.”

That last comment is absolutely worth reblogging.

8:54pm August 20, 2014
8:50pm August 20, 2014

thehotgirlproject:

the-gingerdancer:

papayadog:

scandalous

 i will reblog this as many times as it takes me to stop finding this funny

SCANDALOUS!

8:35pm August 20, 2014

wilwheaton:

mjolnirismypenis:

imnothavinit:

Notice something in common in these photos?

It’s not what you think

I gave it away in the third pic

That’s right! None of these cops are wearing badges or name tags! I wonder why… seems like it’d be important to wear those, since it’s even illegal not to in other states…

This is actually illegal in all states. A police officer must be marked as such with name and badge at all times unless their jurisdiction states otherwise (such as an undercover officer), and even when not wearing a badge, the officer must have the badge accessible at all times and must show the badge in order to make an arrest. Name tags are not required as long as a badge is available because the badge has the officer number on it.

This has really been bothering me. The police in Ferguson are breaking the law by concealing their identities. Everyone knows this, it’s been going on for ten days, and it appears that nobody is doing anything about it.

The police are clearly and systematically violating the first amendment rights of the press, and they are getting away with it. This has been happening for days, and nobody appears to be doing anything about it.

A police officer pointed a rifle at a journalist and told him to fuck off *while he was being filmed, so he’s easily identifiable by his superiors*, and that police officer still has a job.

I know that not all cops are bad (or even most cops), but there are clearly bad cops in Ferguson, and they’re acting with complete impunity. I don’t understand why those cops aren’t being taken off the scene, and why a higher (possibly federal) authority isn’t coming in to address these things.